| As
a partnered pair of sex educators we, of course, felt it was our duty
to explore the Viagra experience before we gave our opinions to our
clients and the public (the things we do for science). Although
we had some initial concerns after what we had read and heard, just
like everyone else, we were curious.
Just in case you have somehow missed the media blitz, the recent
approval of Viagra by the FDA has created a firestorm of interest
from the media and the public. Viagra is the first of a new generation
of drugs that aid with male erectile problems by targeting a key
enzyme that controls blood flow to the penis.
As anticipated, the initial demand for Viagra has been tremendous,
with projected first year sales of $4 billion. Every day there are
numerous stories about Viagra on television and in the other media.
Such public figures as Bob and Elizabeth Dole sheepishly extol its
use. Jokes about Viagra and its use appear everywhere and it has
become fodder for TV talk shows and has even been worked into the
plots of series programs such as "NYPD Blue."
Aside from the joy of another opportunity to ply our sensual skills
together in the interest of public service, we also wanted to know,
first hand, how the medical community was responding to patient
demand. As the Viagra publicity broke, we were most concerned about
the way it was being marketed by the drug company and the potential
emotional/relationship effects of treating only the physical symptoms
of erectile issues, while perhaps ignoring the emotional components.
Until fairly recently, the generally held wisdom was that erectile
difficulties were anxiety-based in approximately 95% of cases with
only 5% resulting primarily from physiological reasons, such as
diabetes, where proper blood flow to the penis was impaired. Anxiety
caused by such things as male performance fears, relationship problems
and/or the stresses caused by modern living can also cause an inhibiting
of blood flow to the penis. Traditional treatment has usually been
by talk therapy and/or sensate focus exercises where the patient
and his partner were taught how to touch and be touched in non-coital
ways of sexual expression that did not require erection. The benefit
of this approach was to not only broaden the couple's sexual repertoire,
but also to reduce anxieties so that erections could appear naturally.
Pfizer, the drug company which is the holder of the Viagra patent,
and others now say that due to such new developments as antidepressants,
increased rates of prostate cancer, and other medical conditions,
as many as 80% of male erectile problems are now primarily physiologically
based, not psychologically based. While the Viagra trials
involved men with identifiable physiological conditions, Pfizer
and others are telling us that as many as 30 million men in the
U.S. may suffer from ED (Erectile Dysfunction) and be candidates
for Viagra. Needless to say, the drug companies would like a broad
and profitable distribution of these drugs.
In fact, the broadening of the definition of Erectile Dysfunction
pathologizes age-old male sexual anxieties about obtaining and maintaining
erections. There is probably hardly a man alive who has not experienced
some difficulty or concern about erections at some time in his life.
These new drugs treat emotional discomfort as well as "disease."
The practical problem for physicians, as patients are demanding
Viagra, is to determine the appropriateness of this as a treatment
for the patient's condition. If we simply raise men's levels of
performance, without raising the couple's consciousness around sexuality,
we may indeed see some interesting side effects such as "Viagra
divorce."
To compound the problem, surveys have found that 36% of physicians
are reluctant to discuss sexual health issues with their patients.
Of these, almost one in three report that it is either "extremely
difficult" or "very difficult" to discuss sexual function with their
patients. This is not surprising considering that they have received
only an average of 12 hours of classroom study in medical school
on the subject of human sexuality, other than for reproductive biology.
Many doctors have received no training at all and the trend in medical
schools is definitely towards less theoretical learning and more
towards problem-based learning. It is natural that in problem-based
learning the inclination will be to treat the failure to be able
to achieve and maintain erection with medication or surgery. However,
here again this "problem-solving" approach often fails the patient,
since by merely treating the symptom rather than the emotional cause
of the problem, it may likely resurface in the same way or creates
new problems.
As to our personal adventure with Viagra, and in fairness to this
audience, we must disclose that due to our education and training,
in our sexual relationship, we have already studied and gleefully
mastered sexual and sensual techniques to prolong and extend our
lovemaking. So, we were certainly curious as to how Viagra would
impact us, if at all.
Gary's view: Gary admits that he had a great deal of difficulty
writing about Viagra before actually experiencing it. "I approached
my personal physician, who knows I am a sexologist, about writing
a prescription so that I could give it a first hand try. He properly
required that I have my annual physical before he would prescribe
Viagra. After I passed the physical with flying colors, he wrote
a prescription for six 50-mg. Viagra tablets. Unfortunately, my
health insurance would not cover the cost of the prescription, so
my cost for six 50-mg. pills was $57.49. Interestingly enough, the
pharmacist told me that the charge would have been the same if I
had been prescribed six 100-mg. tablets. Needless to say, this made
me somewhat suspicious about Pfizer's pricing policies and profit
margins."
"Without telling Shama in advance, so as to see whether she would
detect any difference in my erection, I swallowed my Viagra tablet
on Saturday morning before she woke up. We had recently experienced
a challenging two-week separation, and had only reunited the night
before with fevered passion. So when I awoke, I was still pretty
emotionally and sexually charged."
"It was a very interesting experience. I was pleased to find that
the effect of the drug felt very natural. There was no sensation
of localized pressure or any unnatural inflammation that I had felt
previously when I experimented with Muse urethral suppositories.
Over the course of the day, we made love several times, taking breaks
to eat and deal with life. I found I was able to attain, maintain
and lose erections Ð and then begin the cycle over again, and
regain an erection, quite easily and naturally. Not having to be
concerned about losing an erection took a lot of pressure off of
me. It allowed me to do a number of things during intercourse, such
as simply remaining motionless inside Shama for several minutes,
that I could not have done without Viagra. This substantially increased
our pleasure and sense of intimacy and created the opportunity for
us to explore additional things that I could do with my stiff penis
to give Shama pleasure."
Shama's view: "I noticed upon waking that Gary's erection
was unusually hard. I just thought it had to do with the excitement
of our reunion. With the training we have had to prolong lovemaking,
some of the exercises we use to forestall ejaculation will temporarily
soften the erection slightly as the sexual energy is re-directed
from the genitals to the rest of the body. However, this time, each
time we made love it stayed really hard during intercourse Ð
and it was markedly noticeable."
"We are not usually particularly intercourse-focused in our lovemaking.
We really enjoy exploring all the other realms of pleasuring one
another. However, that day I must admit that we engaged in intercourse
to a far greater degree than usual. Even though my intellect knows
that the woman is not responsible for her partner's erection or
arousal, my emotions sometimes still operate according to a program
that feels somewhat responsible. In retrospect, I
think that because his erection was so strong, I felt it actually
took some of the pressure off of me to help maintain a certain level
of arousal between us, so that intercourse was a more readily available
option. The combination of our thrill at reconnecting after our
separation, the emotional depth and openness that we were ready
to explore to expand our relationship, combined with what I viewed
as his impressive arousal state made that day beautifully memorable
and juicy for us."
The next day, Sunday, we were giving a party. We were very tired
from our reunion celebrations and stressed from the demands of preparation
and hosting. We were still not feeling as grounded in our connection
together as we would have liked and a little anxious. It had been
a difficult day so, at bedtime on Sunday, as another experiment,
Gary took another 50-mg. Viagra tablet. "Interestingly
enough, even though my penis was stimulated and my desire was there,
my erectile response was minimal. T his confirmed my suspicion that,
while many men may find immediate success when first trying Viagra,
they may have somewhat less success in attaining and maintaining
an erection if they are tired or there are relationship or other
difficulties present when they attempt to connect sexually with
their partners."
Since the initial problem
may be psychologically based, it is possible that there may be significant
psychological and emotional side effects in treating the symptom
and not addressing relationship issues. In most cases, this is the
patient's and his partner's anxiety and discomfort around sexuality.
This is most often caused by a lack of knowledge in this area and/or
discomfort with even discussing non-medical treatment options or
alternative behaviors.
Couples may find that
after initial success in using Viagra, the effect may very well
"wear off." This temporary cure, which can create erection-on-demand,
but not necessarily the knowledge of "how to use it" may actually
compound emotional and psychological problems that already exist
in the patient and in his relationship(s). Sex is not just about
a stiff penis, but is also about communication and mutual validation.
Erectile or any other difficulties in sex between men and women
are not just the problem of the partner with the physical difficulty.
Please know that the
point of this article is not to condemn science for building a better
mousetrap. There are millions of men with true physical conditions
that may prevent an erection. However, our concern is that most
doctors have neither the knowledge about Human Sexuality nor the
resources to determine the most appropriate treatment. We would
recommend that continuing education classes be required in human
sexuality, so that physicians can gain the necessary expertise and
skills to more fully serve the needs of their patients.
Our belief is that doctors
need to be trained to take a look at the bigger picture in the way
they evaluate symptomology. In this case, we would argue that impotence
is about more than a lack of an erection. Impotence literally is
a sense of powerlessness. We have often found that feeling of powerlessness
comes from apprehension from a deep-seated knowing that most men
haven't been properly educated or trained in sexual expression so
that their lovemaking can truly show love and caring for their partners
and themselves. Many of our clients have admitted that they are
apprehensive because, at core, they don't feel competent and, in
many cases, they're not. Knowledge is power. The knowledge of how
to have our sexuality be satisfying to ourselves and our partners
can make us more potent than any pill or drug.
Another concern that
came out of our experience was whether men might become even more
intercourse-focused (than they already are) and less interested
in so-called foreplay or other non-intercourse activities. It seems
to us that the traditional approach towards erectile difficulties,
of taking the focus off attaining an erection and putting it on
the myriad of pleasurable activities available, is still a good
idea. We feel that many of these other types of activities naturally
contribute to increased intimacy and heart connection between partners,
which we believe is essential to healthy relationships.
What Viagra can provide
is a reduction of anxiety about whether an erection can be attained
and can create a situation for men where intercourse actually is
another option in lovemaking (where it may not have been
readily available previously). However, we want to stress here,
that for healthy relationships, the act of intercourse is best used
when it feels most appropriate, but please, not as the goal
of lovemaking. We still believe that the goal of lovemaking should
be the conveyance between the partners of their love, caring and
nurturing of each other. In this regard, we see the potential of
Viagra as a valuable "tool."
Another area where Viagra
can make a valuable contribution is in the reduction of "condom
anxiety" on the part of men. Many men are reluctant to use condoms
because of fears of loss of sensitivity and/or failure to attain
or maintain an erection. The increased sensitivity caused by Viagra
could go a long way towards encouraging a greater use of condoms
and thus, safer sex practices during intercourse.
Also, trials have begun
to assess the value of Viagra in increasing the blood flow and perhaps,
vaginal and clitoral sensitivity in women. A couple of weeks after
Gary's experiment, Shama elected to try Viagra (also in the interest
of science). "When Gary and I made love this time, I noticed
a marked increase in sensitivity in my genitals which did heighten
my pleasure. He also commented that I felt "wetter and juicier"
than usual. I believe that for me, as well, I was able to "stay
with it" for a more extended period of time."
"Would I do it again?
Although I did notice some improvement in my functioning, the degree
to which I experienced improvement was not enough to inspire me
to overcome my natural distrust of synthetic chemicals. However,
if I was experiencing more dysfunction in my nether regions, I might.
My "bottom line" on the use of Viagra is one of caution as regards
our enthusiastic acceptance and use, since the long term effects
and results are really not in yet."
Determining whether Viagra
may have value to women may create an opportunity for long needed
research into female sexuality and how to improve women's pleasure
during sex. In the past, there has been a lot more research done
on male sexual function but these new drugs, including Viagra, may
change all that. Public interest in this medication may give women
greater permission to talk about their sex lives, how they are experiencing
sex and how that might be improved. Also, with "baby boomers" approaching
menopause, there is a greater need than ever to study the physiological
changes that these changes bring to women's sex lives.
Medications like Viagra
can make a contribution towards a happier sex life, but it is still
most important that men and women know how to more fully use their
bodies as instruments of pleasure. The real task is to give people
permission to talk about their sexuality and to educate everyone,
particularly those in the helping professions, as to the true potential
of our sexuality and sensuality as an expression of our love and
caring. We all need to understand that people need to work at having
a good sex life in order to make it work for them.
While Viagra is not the
long sought-after aphrodisiac that will create desire and turn sexual
problems into bliss, it does have a potential for good. It is creating
the opportunity and permission for dialogue on a once-taboo subject.
It has already caused many of us to stop and look deeper at all
the aspects of our sexuality, how to improve the quality of our
sexual experience, and what role we want sex to play in our relationships.
|